Edaphic Attributes in Different Successional Ecological Restoration Models Consortium with Eucalyptus in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest
Milton Marques Fernandes, Marcelo Brandão José, Marcos Gervasio Pereira, Milena Viviane Almeida Vieira, Igor Sousa Morais, Tiago Paula Silva, Renisson Neponuceno Araújo Filho
Abstract
This work aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of forest restoration consortium or not with eucalyptus in the recovery of edaphic attributes. Three of them were managed with the following forest restorations: natural regeneration after clear cutting of eucalyptus planting (RP), planting of native species after clear cutting of eucalyptus planting (RA) and planting of native species after cutting 50% of eucalyptus planting (RAE), and of a secondary forest (FR). Sixteen (16) soil samples were collected in each area for the analysis of the physical and chemical attributes. The restoration with RA promoted a less acidic pH, lower Al 3+ content, higher P content and higher V%, similar to FR. The RAE and RP restorations favor an increase in SB, CTC, N and in the organic carbon content.
Keywords
References
-
Aimi SC, Araujo MM, Rorato DG, Dutra AF, Callegaro RM. Estrutura horizontal e influência de características do solo em fragmento de Floresta Ombrófila Mista. Nativa 2017; 5(1): 151-156.
-
Amazonas NT, Forrester DI, Silva CC, Almeida DRA, Rodrigues RR, Brancalion PHS. High diversity mixed plantations of Eucalyptus and native trees: An interface between production and restoration for the tropics. Forest Ecology and Management 2018; 417(2): 247-256.
-
Benites VM, Madari B, Machado PLOA. Extração e fracionamento quantitativo de substâncias húmicas do solo: um procedimento simplificado de baixo custo. Rio de Janeiro: EMBRAPA Solos; 2003.
-
Brancalion PHS, Schweizer UG, Mangueira JR, Lamonato F, Farah FT, Nave AG et al. Brinde economic costs and ecological outcomes of passive and active restoration in agricultural landscapes: the case of Brazil. Biotropica 2016; 48(6): 856-867.
-
Brancalion PHS, Amazonas NT, Chazdon RL, Van Melis J, Rodrigues RR, Silva CC et al. Exotic eucalypts: From demonized trees to allies of tropical forest restoration?. Journal of Applied Ecology 2021; 57(1): 55-66.
-
Bustamante MMC, Silva JS, Scariot A, Sampaio AB, Mascia DL. Ecological restoration as a strategy for mitigating and adapting to climate change: lessons and challenges from Brazil. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 2019; 24(7): 1249-1270.
-
Cambardella CA, Elliott ET. Particulate soil organicmatter changes across a grassland cultivation sequence. Soil Science Society of America Journal 1992; 56(1): 777783.
-
Calgaro HF, Valério WVF, Aquino SS, Maltoni KL, Cassiolato AMR. Adubação química e orgânica na recuperação da fertilidade de subsolo degradado e na micorrização do Stryphnodendron polyphyllum . Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 2008; 32(1): 1337-1347.
-
Castelli KR, Barreto MG, Francesconi W, Valle LD, Mondelli G, Abílio FM et al. Analysis of effectiveness of three forest interventionist techniques and proposal of a new and integrated model of forest restoration. Environmental Technology 2015; 36(1): 1-33.
-
Chazdon, R.L. The cost of restoring carbon stocks in Brazil’s Atlantic Forest. Land Degradation Development 2019; 32(1): 830–841.
-
Dodonov P, Silva DM, Rosatti NB. Understorey vegetation gradient in a Eucalyptus grandis plantation between a savanna and a semideciduous forest. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 2014; 44(1): 1-10.
-
Fernandes MRM, Fernandes MM, Almeida AQ, Gonzaga MIS, Goncalves FG. Ecologia da Paisagem de uma Bacia Hidrográfica dos Tabuleiros Costeiros do Brasil. Floresta e Ambiente 2017; 24(1): 1-9.
-
Fontes JAC. Caracterização geoambiental da sub-bacia do rio Fundo [Dissertação]. São Cristovão: Universidade Federal de Sergipe; 2010.
-
Guareschi RF, Pereira MG, Anjos LHC, Menezes CEG, Correia MEF. Atributos químicos e físicos do solo sob pastagem e estádios sucessionais de floresta estacional. Revista de la Facultad de Agronomía (La Plata) 2014; 113(1): 47-56.
-
Klippel VH, Pezzopane JEM, Caldeira MVW, Silva GF, Castro KC. Acúmulo de serapilheira e nutrientes em área com diferentes metodologias de Restauração Florestal. Comunicata Scientiae 2016; 7(1): 241-250.
-
Klug I, Mafra ÁL, Friederichs A, Rech C, Fert Neto J. Atributos químicos do solo em plantios florestais em substituição à vegetação nativa em campos de altitude. Ciência Florestal 2020; 30(1): 279-290.
-
José MB. Viabilidade econômica e ecológica dos modelos sucessionais de restauração florestal nos serviços ambientais na Mata Atlântica brasileira [Dissertação]. São Cristovão: Universidade Federal de Sergipe; 2023.
-
Machado DL, Pereira MG, Santos LL, Diniz AR, Guareschi RF. Organic matter and soil fertility in different successional stages of seasonal semidecidual forest. Revista Caatinga 2019; 32(1): 179-188.
-
Moraes LFD, Campello EFC, Pereira MG, Loss A. Características do solo na restauração de áreas degradadas na Reserva Biológica de Poço das Antas, RJ. Ciência Florestal 2008; 18(1): 193-206.
-
Rosa CM, Marques MCM. How are biodiversity and carbon stock recovered during tropical forest restoration? Supporting the ecological paradigms and political context involved. Journal for nature conservation 2022; 65(1): 202-217.
-
Troeh FR, Thompson LM. Solos e fertilidade do solo. 1. Ed. São Paulo: Editora Andrei; 2007.
-
Zahawi RA, Reid JL, Holl KD. Hidden costs of passive restoration. Restoration Ecology 2014; 22(3): 284-287.
-
Zanini AM, Mayrinck RC, Vieira SA, Camargo PB, Rodrigues RR. The effect of ecological restoration methods on carbon stocks in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Forest Ecology and Management 2021; 481(1): 118-138.
Submitted date:
11/21/2023
Accepted date:
08/28/2024